07 Aug 2022

Solution Selling Isn’t Enough When Promoting Lab Services

Peter Francis

August 2022


Let’s first look at a definition of solution selling (also referred to as consultative selling).
Basically, it’s asking clients questions about the problems they’re having with a product or
service, and the sales representative talks about the solution his/her company offers to fix it.
This sales approach has been in vogue since the early 70s as evidenced by a book by Mack
Hanan called Consultative Selling. An interesting point: questions persuade more powerfully
than any other form of verbal behavior. The Greek philosopher, Socrates, discovered this about
2400 years ago. He used questions to teach. And he was very skilled at asking a series of easily
answered questions that inevitably lead to a logical conclusion.


Before the development of consultative selling, salespeople used a basic technique some refer
to as “show up and throw up.” This is Era 1 sales. In business-to-business situations, it equates
to a futile approach, because it implies babbling about your wonderful product or service
without any back-and-forth conversation to uncover specific needs. If you’re a sales rep
reading this, forget Era 1 sales. You won’t get very far. In fact, you could get yourself fired for
lack of new business.


Solution Selling: What the Winners Do
Under the conventional solution selling method (Era 2 sales), labs instruct (or should instruct)
their field staff to align a solution with an acknowledged customer need and explain why it’s
better than the other lab’s. A conversation example could sound like this:
REP: I’ve talked to other offices like yours, and they tell me they have issues with their lab.
What are some of yours?
Client: Well…..let’s see. Things are going well with ABC Lab right now. We don’t really have
any barn-burning problems. They have a reliable courier, and the report turnaround is usually
the next day into our EMR. (Pause) The only thing I can think of—but it’s not critical—is
sometimes it takes a week to receive supplies after we’ve placed the order.


REP: Oh, we can fix that. We deliver supplies within 24-48 hours after receiving the request.
We never get any complaints about it. Would you like to try us out?
CLIENT: As I said, it’s not a major problem, and we’re not going to bring in another lab just
because of occasional slow supply turnaround. There’s really nothing else significantly
problematic going on that would cause us to try another lab. Thanks for stopping by. Check
back with me in three or four months to see how things are going.


What’s happening in this brief conversation? The client perceives a small issue but doesn’t
think it’s worthy of trying a different lab.


It’s not sufficient to uncover problems and immediately offer solutions. What else should
he/she have done? It’s here where implication questions become essential in the selling
process. It can emotionally transition a conversation from probing about facts to
understanding the emotional drivers if a problem persists. Let’s look at what a master-class
representative would have done using an implication technique during a conversation:


REP: I’ve talked to other similar offices, and they tell me they have issues with their lab. What
are some of yours?
Client: Well…. let’s see. Things are going well with ABC Lab right now. We don’t really have
any major problems. They have a reliable courier, and the report turnaround is usually the next
day into our EMR. (Pause) The only thing I can think of—but it’s not critical—is sometimes it
takes a week to receive supplies after we’ve placed an order.
REP: I’m glad things are going relatively well with your lab. However, I see how it can be
frustrating not to have the proper lab supply on hand. How does the doctor feel about this?
CLIENT: He can get frustrated, and he asks me or Joannie at the front desk to call the lab and
expedite the order.
REP: Does it mean he has to ask the patient to make a special trip to a patient center?
CLIENT: Yes, that’s usually what happens.
REP: Do you think it’s embarrassing for the doctor and inconvenient for the patient?
CLIENT: Yes it is—now that you mention it. The doctor likes to handle his patients’ lab needs
here at the office because it helps with patient compliance. In the past, he used to refer them
to a service center for blood draws, but many patients forget or procrastinate.
REP: Have your medical assistants run into problems with the lack of any supplies?
CLIENT: One person mentioned it to me. She complained about spending time checking in
different rooms. It was an obvious case of frustration, which I can understand.
REP: I think we can both agree this situation creates awkward and aggravating circumstances.
Let me explain our supply delivery policy.


What effect has the marketer had on the client’s value equation? He/she has taken a
seemingly irrelevant issue and mushroomed it to where the client thinks more seriously about
it. If not at this point, the customer may consider a trial with this lab should another issue
surface. Not only has the salesperson expanded the problem, he/she has also fostered an
essential sales attribute—credibility. One other important point: using implication questions
are particularly powerful when selling to decision-makers and those who are highly influential.



These principals know success depends on seeing beyond the immediate problem. They
understand effects and consequences. Implications are their language. So, speak their
language. You will influence them more effectively.


Solution Sales: The Good and Bad
Given the above scenario, those in lab sales covet finding a client undergoing lab issues. It’s the
raw material upon which reps build meaningful sales interactions. If an office experiences lab
glitches, and a marketing person stops in at a propitious moment, a provider or office manager
will undoubtedly welcome a conversation. Unfortunately, that scenario parallels playing the
lottery.


It stands to reason when a lab representative speaks to an office manager or provider for the
first time, he/she hasn’t built trust or rapport. There prevail two primary objectives a
salesperson should have when making his/her initial sales call. First, lower the client’s
defensive shield by building trust/credibility and second, find out the circumstances of the
client’s lab. Uncovering the incumbent lab’s background is straight forward, such as
independent or owned office, primary/secondary labs, satisfaction level, decision-making
process, specimen collection (in-house vs. patient center), connectivity, likes and dislikes about
the lab, etc. However, asking many questions can easily develop into a boring meeting. There
is no “get” for the client. It highlights the notable adage for the customer: what’s in it for me?


Insight Selling
There exists a sales method called Insight sales where marketing winners can lower the
defensive shield and start building credibility. Professionals name this Era 3 sales. This new
breed of sellers bring value to the table—the value of insight. So, instead of describing a metoo lab service, the salesperson becomes the value. Naturally, if the proposing lab offers a
unique test, profile, methodology or special service, there resides a built-in differentiator. But
many labs present similar amenities. It distills down to differentiating service levels, and a
marketing person corresponds to a significant part of the lab/client equation.


Several years ago, when my sales rep and I were making a call on a prospective account, the
office manager described her lab’s field rep this way:


“Steve is our representative for our lab, and whenever I meet with him, I feel like I learn
something. He always brings us relevant information dealing with a variety of topics for
the doctor and/or our office. He understands our business. He makes it his job to add
something to our relationship. Sure, we can get a simple transactional lab service from
anyone, but that’s just a commodity. We’ve never had such a collaborative rep like
Steve. We appreciate his visits because we know he won’t waste our time with just a
simple “howdie” call.”


I immediately thought to myself this guy, Steve, stands tall in my book. His laboratory trained
him very well, and this vendor understands the value their field staff can offer customers. It
goes far beyond asking the age-old, insipid question, “Any lab issues I can help you with?” It
was obvious Steve and his employer investigate relevant education material to use as handouts
to clients and prospects. Such info can be announcements found on the Internet from various
government organizations (CMS, CDC, FDA, USPSTF, etc.), pertinent clinical abstracts, Choosing
Wisely.org, medical society’s evidence-based guidelines, disease testing algorithms, test
explanation sheet, informative patient info, etc. The substance doesn’t necessarily have to be
related to lab testing (in fact, it enhances one’s credibility if it’s not self-serving). An important
point: this type of value approach should not only be part of a first-time call, but it should
continue in follow-up visits. If the customer becomes a client, the education approach needs to
persist. It not only builds credibility and rapport, but it keeps the competition at bay.
Additionally, if future problems arise, the client may be more forgiving due to the respect and
empathy they have for their lab service person. Using insights offers a valid reason to see
somebody—especially when calling on a prospect for the first time. The marketer doesn’t have
to be deeply knowledgeable about the topic. The point is, he/she thinks enough of the client to
share relevant, health care information. This axiom comes to mind: sharing creates the
relationship and builds rapport. Once the rep explains he/she thought the doctor might be
interested in the subject, the rep (in the initial call cycle) can transition into probing about the
incumbent lab. In the world of give-and-take, it’s, “I have something you might find interesting,
and, in return, I’d appreciate it if you would answer some questions about your lab.”


With almost 50 years in the lab industry, I have come to realize that when you sell, you break
rapport. But when you educate, you build it. I have asked many providers what else they
would like to see in a lab vendor other than testing and reporting results. Some doctors paused
and gave it serious thought. The most often response was, “Help keep me up-dated so I can
improve health to my patients.” In concert with this point, Dr. Graham McMahon in an
editorial piece in the August 2015 issue of the Journal of American Medical Association had this
to say:


"Physicians are facing enormous pressure in a rapidly changing healthcare environment
and look to the education community to help them stay current with advances in
medicine and provide optimal care…….clinicians expect relevant education .….”


There resides yet another advantage for using Insight sales: it provides an opportunity to
ensure a return visit. When wrapping up a client conversation, a rep could say, “I’m not going
to waste your time in the future with meaningless visits. Unless you call me, the only time
you’re going to see me is when I can present info that will improve patient care. Will you see
me again if I stop back?” I don’t think anyone would say no to that question.


Summary
Solution selling endures as the old standby most reps use when promoting their lab. However,
adding an additional ingredient, implication questions, can expand the rep’s effectiveness and
build credibility. It brings human emotion into the equation—and creating emotion in sales
links to a very strong attribute.


When someone claims there are no lab issues to discuss, and the proposing lab has no unique
differences, reps typically hand out a capabilities brochure and review their me-too offerings.
The client listens patiently and thanks the rep for stopping by. The seller typically concludes the
conversation by requesting the client to call him/her if their current lab’s service deteriorates.


Insight selling remains an important approach when promoting a laboratory’s service. One
marketing company analyzed what sales winners do differently, and they interviewed 150
corporate buyers about recent purchasing experiences. Sales winners not only focus on the
negative (asking about problems), but they also focus on the positive. Sales winners—by a
margin of 3 times over second-place finishers—use education to enhance relationships and
credibility—and to close sales. The health care industry offers a plethora of free public domain
communication on research and/or education, thus providing significant available material for
marketers to use. Unfortunately, few salespeople use this tactic, but it can be a major
differentiator in developing and refining the sales process and in maintaining current clients. As
one astute lab rep once told me: “My clients repay me with loyalty because I teach them
something they value—not try to sell them something they already know.” These are
constructive and practical words to live by if you’re in lab sales.


Peter Francis is president of Clinical Laboratory Sales Training, LLC, a unique training and
development company dedicated to helping laboratories increase their revenues and reputation
through prepared, professional, and productive representatives. He has written more than fifty
articles pertaining to sales/sales management within the reference lab industry. Industry
magazines and periodicals have published more than twenty-five of them. Visit the company’s
web site at www.clinlabsales.com for a complete listing of services and articles.

No Comments